QHR Product Ideas

The spirit of the QHR ideas portal is to collect ideas and feedback from our users for integrations, enhancements, and new features.

We want to hear from you, and encourage you to submit, comment, and vote!

Please note that this site is not regularly monitored, and that there may be a delay in response to your submissions.

QHR reserves the right to choose what is built into the application, and it is the intention of QHR to build the software to meet the needs of the marketplace.

User Resources:

For further support, please reach out to Accuro Client Services:

Interested in connecting with us for user research, or participating in user testing? You can sign-up by filling out this web form, and we will reach out to you for feedback when we're evaluating new ideas.

 

Merged idea

This idea has been merged into another idea. To comment or vote on this idea, please visit ACC-I-7673 Automating Billing Rules (with a pop-up warning) during Scheduling.

Billing Rule Conflict Pop Up When Booking Appointment Merged

Have a warning when booking an appointment that would have a conflict with a billing rule. That way patients are not inadvertently, booked and seen for procedures that the clinic will not be paid for.
  • Guest
  • Jun 20 2016
  • Gathering Your Feedback
  • Daniel Moon commented
    August 25, 2017 23:09

    More-so. 

    It would be fantastic to have rules actually apply to codes that are a part of Appointment Defaults. See example: 

    Description: 
    When using "Billed after date" Billing Rule - Claims made from appointments are not applying the rule. In addition, there is no way to update claims that are already created that should have this rule applied if they were created before the rule was via some sort of re-assess. 

    Workflow: 
    Expected: 
    Create Billing Rule: Billed after date + 02067 + Sept 1st 2017 + Change to: 22067 --> Created an appointment that uses a Type that pulls in 02067 for the code for Sept 2nd 2017 > Rule applies and in Claim the code changes to 22067. 

    Actual: 
    Create Billing Rule: Billed after date + 02067 + Sept 1st 2017 + Change to: 22067 --> Created an appointment that uses a Type that pulls in 02067 for the code for Sept 2nd 2017 > Rule doesn't effect the Claim's code and it shows 02067 UNLESS you manually open Claim Details and Tab for every single claim. 

    Troubleshooting: 
    Attempted every order of creating appointment, creating rule, setting appointment type to attempt a different result > Nothing worked. 

    **Note: Using New Bill or New Patient Bill functions DID proc the rule. 

    Query: 
    Would it be possible to add this functionality? Currently, when using a PCode in an Appointment Type it is not generating the Rule proc that is associated to the PCode when the claim is created from this very common method.

    Thank you

  • +4