QHR Product Ideas
The spirit of the QHR ideas portal is to collect ideas and feedback from our users for integrations, enhancements, and new features.
We want to hear from you, and encourage you to submit, comment, and vote!
Please note that this site is not regularly monitored, and that there may be a delay in response to your submissions.
QHR reserves the right to choose what is built into the application, and it is the intention of QHR to build the software to meet the needs of the marketplace.
User Resources:
Accuro Learning Academy, our eLearning platform (reach out to Client Services for your sign-up code)
For further support, please reach out to Accuro Client Services:
1-866-729-8889
Accuro Menu > Help > Send Feedback
Interested in connecting with us for user research, or participating in user testing? You can sign-up by filling out this web form, and we will reach out to you for feedback when we're evaluating new ideas.
The spirit of the QHR ideas portal is to collect ideas and feedback from our users for integrations, enhancements, and new features.
We want to hear from you, and encourage you to submit, comment, and vote!
Please note that this site is not regularly monitored, and that there may be a delay in response to your submissions.
QHR reserves the right to choose what is built into the application, and it is the intention of QHR to build the software to meet the needs of the marketplace.
User Resources:
Accuro Learning Academy, our eLearning platform (reach out to Client Services for your sign-up code)
For further support, please reach out to Accuro Client Services:
1-866-729-8889
Accuro Menu > Help > Send Feedback
Interested in connecting with us for user research, or participating in user testing? You can sign-up by filling out this web form, and we will reach out to you for feedback when we're evaluating new ideas.
Correct (sort of) on the idea #2 posted by Lauren is that when either a test is selected as file document or send to provider, the person doing the original filing from the document tab reconciles the tests and results. Therefor removing the task of reconcilling from the physician completely upon reviewing. The physicians do not have time/ or patience to select the reconcilition everytime they review a document. Most often the ignore button is selected, thus never being reconciled. As a reception staff , I maintain the oustanding requisitions, referrals and orders. If the physician is not reconciling it, it lowers the efficiency of using the module to track tests. Which is unfortunate as it is an excellent tracking system to make sure patient are getting the tests done that were ordered .
Attachments Open full size
Outstanding Requisitions are reconciled when any Document with the type of Lab is reviewed.
You are likely not seeing the prompt to reconcile at any stage of reviewing documents because they are not being filed as the Type Lab. If you being to use the Type Lab, and then enable Sub-Types to properly categorize the document you are filing/reviewing this should help the reconciliation process and prompt you for reconciliation.
Next, the pop-up for reconciliation only happens when Review is pressed. So if an admin staff member is sending a Document to the Provider to review, they are not reviewing it so the pop-up is not present. IF the admin staff member used File Document as opposed to Send to Provider AND the Type was Lab they would receive the pop-up for reconciliation.
The above workflow only works though if the Provider does not need to actually Review the lab.
I think what this idea is asking for is two fold:
Be able to choose the Types of Documents that prompt for reconciliation (not just Lab)
Prompt for reconciliation when using Send to Provider in addition to when Review is pressed
Attachments Open full size