The spirit of the QHR ideas portal is to collect ideas and feedback from our users for integrations, enhancements, and new features.
We want to hear from you, and encourage you to submit, comment, and vote!
Please note that this site is not regularly monitored, and that there may be a delay in response to your submissions.
QHR reserves the right to choose what is built into the application, and it is the intention of QHR to build the software to meet the needs of the marketplace.
User Resources:
Accuro Learning Academy, our eLearning platform (reach out to Client Services for your sign-up code)
For further support, please reach out to Accuro Client Services:
1-866-729-8889
Accuro Menu > Help > Send Feedback
Interested in providing regular feedback on product ideas and designs that are team is exploring? Send an email with your Name, Email, Specialty and Province to uxresearch@qhrtech.com with the subject "Interested in participating in research".
And not just for 80% - also and especially for 1.85% procedures, currently covered by the "bilateral" code set-up. However, this is insufficient. As soon as a bilateral surgery or rather 2 services of the same surgery are billed together with a higher fee code, the "bilateral" setting has to be undone so that 2 service at 85% each can be billed instead with the higher fee code at 100%. Why not offer more percentage options? Why not offer 0.925, which is one unit at 100% and one at 85%, so that any surgical code can become a "bilateral" one by simply using the drop-down menu? I encounter this all the time. I bill for a plastic and reconstructive surgeon, who routinely performs and bills numerous surgical codes.