QHR Product Ideas

The spirit of the QHR ideas portal is to collect ideas and feedback from our users for integrations, enhancements, and new features.

We want to hear from you, and encourage you to submit, comment, and vote!

Please note that this site is not regularly monitored, and that there may be a delay in response to your submissions.

QHR reserves the right to choose what is built into the application, and it is the intention of QHR to build the software to meet the needs of the marketplace.

User Resources:

For further support, please reach out to Accuro Client Services:

Interested in connecting with us for user research, or participating in user testing? You can sign-up by filling out this web form, and we will reach out to you for feedback when we're evaluating new ideas.

Stop quarterly password reset

Busy users of the EMR do not want to reset their EMR password on a quarterly basis or at all.


Compelling users to reset their password every 3 months has several downsides - 1. it is an undue burden on users, 2. the intended effect of a mandatory password reset is improved security. The safest spot for a password is in the user's memory. Though users may be advised to use a password manager, users cannot be compelled to use a password manager - many users might document their new password in a spot that is not secure at their workstation, thus reducing security. 3. mandatory password changes may result in users forgetting their passwords and being locked out of the charts in the days after a password change, reducing efficient patient care, 4. 2-step verification should make the mandatory password change redundant.


I urge Accuro-QHR to revisit the policy of mandatory password changes and cancel it altogether.

  • Orli Nadel
  • Aug 30 2023
  • Needs Review
  • Attach files
  • Angus Cherry commented
    September 04, 2023 20:03

    strong agree

  • Guest commented
    August 30, 2023 18:16
    Agree completely,multi-factor authentication makes these frequent resets redundant.
  • Guest commented
    August 30, 2023 18:03
    Strongly agree!
  • Maya Nadel commented
    August 30, 2023 17:54

    Absolutely agree. Undue burden plus actually achieving the exact opposite of the intended outcome (i.e. reduced security).

  • Guest commented
    August 30, 2023 17:43

    I Agree!

  • Eric Stutz commented
    August 30, 2023 17:26

    Could not agree more!