The spirit of the QHR ideas portal is to collect ideas and feedback from our users for integrations, enhancements, and new features.
We want to hear from you, and encourage you to submit, comment, and vote!
Please note that this site is not regularly monitored, and that there may be a delay in response to your submissions.
QHR reserves the right to choose what is built into the application, and it is the intention of QHR to build the software to meet the needs of the marketplace.
User Resources:
Accuro Learning Academy, our eLearning platform (reach out to Client Services for your sign-up code)
For further support, please reach out to Accuro Client Services:
1-866-729-8889
Accuro Menu > Help > Send Feedback
Interested in connecting with us for user research, or participating in user testing? You can sign-up by filling out this web form, and we will reach out to you for feedback when we're evaluating new ideas.
Currently we can only specify a default Site (when the option is enabled) by going to: Scheduler > Scheduler Management > Settings. This allows us to set a Site preference for appointments and walk-ins, but there are no options to specify a default site for ad hoc billing. The field shows as an option in the Claim Details window.
It would be convenient if there was a way to specify preference for this field by provider in F2 (something like the 'Default SLI for New Ad Hoc Bills' dropdown menu), as well as to specify preferences for it in Batch Billing and Billing Macros.
I am 1000% on board to all the default billing site to be provider specific instead of office specific.
This would allow save us a significant amount of time when it comes to billing. We currently have 5 providers under 1 site and 8 under another. So in either case there is a lot of manual updating of claims before submission to provincial health (MB).
Totally agree...providers should be able to set a default provider (in AB) for ad hoc billing. This is a much bigger problem with COVID as we do a great deal more telephone work than before.